Monday, 26 October 2009
Are the Organisers criminally negligent?
This is indeed a great tragedy, Hanging bridge collapses, 22 pupils drown in motivational program training.... and it illustrates once again the "tidak apa" attitudes of those who have been entrusted to do a job, and to ensure the safety of our children. Its hindsight comment unfortunately, but it has to be brought out for public opinion the question; "did the organisers actually went through the "course content" and the sites designated for the program to ensure that every part is in tip top condition (or repairs made) and the routes safe for the children, BEFORE the commencement of the training. I think answers have to be givien in order that the aggrieved parents and relatives know that their children's safety have not been compromised. Lessons will have to be learnt from this needless tragedy
Can an Aussie Expert save our motorcyclists?
I have read the letter WHY DON'T WE HIRE AUSSIE EXPERTS ON ROAD SAFETY? and I share the writer's concern over the mounting road deaths in our country especially of our motorcycle riders. I agree also with his comment that issuing police summons which largely remained unpaid and unenforced, and have to be collected through the giving of huge discounts, but I disagree with his suggestion that we hire an Aussie Road Death expert to study our problem and offer solutions. We know the problems causing such unnecessary deaths, we only need to brainstorm the solution. Hiring an expensive "Aussie Expert" who does not understand the local social and political culture in the country, will only be a waste of our funds on solutions that do not fit our needs. The causes of our high road deaths are as follows:
- The inadequacy of our motorcycle "testing" program. We all know of our infamous testing schools with "guaranteed" passes that can produce motorcyclists who have not learned how to ride properly
- Australians, by and large, follow all traffic rules, including putting on the indicator light when changing lanes, failure of which will result in a fine. Do Malaysians indicate when they change lanes?
- Australians generally are polite; cars which reach a cross junction first will be the car that leaves the junction first. In Malaysia, it's the bravest or the most reckless who will jump at the crossroads.
- Motorcyclists in Malaysia generally shoot the Red lights, or make U turns anywhere there is a space.
- Most motorcyclists have expired licences and insurances. Most of them also wear helmets that are not tied properly to the chin. Yesterday I saw a motorcycle with a pillion rider shoot the red light at a junction, crash into the side of a big car, and both the riders fell off the bike, and their helmets went hurtling somewhere else.
- 50% of our foreign workers use motorcycles. Are they properly "tested" and covered with insurance?
- the police seems to be ineffectual in catching these rogues, but with such reckless attitudes and selfish riders, doubling the police will not make much of a difference.
- In the outskirts of a city, finding 3 or more persons on a motorcycle is not unusual. Sometimes without helmets.
Wednesday, 21 October 2009
One million summons, 4 arrests and 50% discount on fines.
I read through this article in Metro MPSJ says there are about 900,000 summons still unpaid..and I wish to quote from the column the statement made by the Honorable president.. "Adnan said that there were 900,000 unpaid parking summonses at MPSJ. He urged those with the summonses to pay quickly to avoid legal action. “We are giving a 50% discount until December and people can even make their payments online via our website. “Out of the 13,627 cases, we have issued 9,522 arrest warrants and 694 warrants have been successful served. “We are planning a big scale arrest operation for repeat offenders from mid-November until December with the help of the police. “So far, 4 arrests have been made and the offenders will be brought to court,”
What can be gleaned from the statement is that out of the almost one million UNPAID summons, only 4 arrests have been made, and a mere 694 warrants have been successfully served. It is a sorry statement of performance (OR NON PERFORMANCE) by MPSJ and the offer of 50% discount to those who have not since paid their fines must be sending absolutely the wrong message to those perpetual offenders. No wonder we find that parking and littering problems continue to be unsolved in PJ and KL ; in fact they seem to be getting worse! Rather than offer discounts, the authorities must redouble their efforts to nab the offenders. It would appear to me that issuing tickets and summons are not effective at all, IF the authorities are not serious in enforcing those summonses. Every offender now knows they will get away cheap, and the chances of being apprehended is next to nil. I am aware that this is not an easy problem to solve, but to continue issuing millions of summonses and letting offenders get away with their "crimes" is just a slap in the face of the Authority.and a waste of everybody's time..
What can be gleaned from the statement is that out of the almost one million UNPAID summons, only 4 arrests have been made, and a mere 694 warrants have been successfully served. It is a sorry statement of performance (OR NON PERFORMANCE) by MPSJ and the offer of 50% discount to those who have not since paid their fines must be sending absolutely the wrong message to those perpetual offenders. No wonder we find that parking and littering problems continue to be unsolved in PJ and KL ; in fact they seem to be getting worse! Rather than offer discounts, the authorities must redouble their efforts to nab the offenders. It would appear to me that issuing tickets and summons are not effective at all, IF the authorities are not serious in enforcing those summonses. Every offender now knows they will get away cheap, and the chances of being apprehended is next to nil. I am aware that this is not an easy problem to solve, but to continue issuing millions of summonses and letting offenders get away with their "crimes" is just a slap in the face of the Authority.and a waste of everybody's time..
Saturday, 17 October 2009
Outlet still operating after more than 10 Police Raids.
Dear Editor,
Reading your report on a raid made by the Police state anti-vice, secret society and gambling branch.Police sources said the outlet(a karaoke joint with illegal foreign workers) had been raided at least 10 times., it is somewhat unsettling to read that the entertainment outlet which employs illegal workers and GROs have been raided AT LEAST 10 TIMES by the Police and the local anti vice authorities! I am not sure what to think of the enforcers, that they have allowed the continued operations of the business blatantly done in defiance of the laws. This begs the questions:
Why is the outlet still operating??
Reading your report on a raid made by the Police state anti-vice, secret society and gambling branch.Police sources said the outlet(a karaoke joint with illegal foreign workers) had been raided at least 10 times., it is somewhat unsettling to read that the entertainment outlet which employs illegal workers and GROs have been raided AT LEAST 10 TIMES by the Police and the local anti vice authorities! I am not sure what to think of the enforcers, that they have allowed the continued operations of the business blatantly done in defiance of the laws. This begs the questions:
- Are the fines and other penalties so trivial that the owners of the business gladly pay them and then commence again their "monkey business"?
- Don't the authorities have the power to close down the premise, and prohibit it from doing the same business again? In this respect, I am aware that in the licensing of gaming and 'entertainment' outlets, a SPECIFIC Police approval is required before such a licence is approved.
- Does that mean the police have approved the business to be carried out there, IN SPITE of having raided this particular outlet at least 10 times?
Why is the outlet still operating??
Thursday, 15 October 2009
Sex Predator in School?
I am reading this news report with disbelief,Man (secret health research assistant?) tries to con teacher into having sex I can glean the following from the details of the news article:
- Police Report made on August 18, after continuous sexual harassment made by the "teacher"
- The person has been remanded for 7 days, but subsequently released and is still apparently teaching in the same school
- Sate Education Officer and State Police have confirmed the case.
- Report of harassment also reported to Health and Education Departments.
Wednesday, 14 October 2009
3 years to get the DNA of a dead bird??
After reading your report SWIFT DECISION and the statement that Swiftlet Farms in Sepang are to stay, I was however struck by the statement made by Mr Mah, the apparent spokesman for the Swiftlet farmers. I quote below:
"...The airport authorities suspect that the birds getting tangled into aircraft were swiftlets but there was no proof from Perhilitan to back their claims.It will take between two and three years for a DNA report to determine the species of birds that get tangled in the engines. They should get proof and provide data on how many accidents have been caused by swiftlets before asking the farmers to relocate...."
I was dumbfounded by the statement that it takes up to three years for somebody to identify the DNA of swiftlets? Other than the obvious cleverness in titling this report a "swift" decision, I feel such an important issue being treated so frivolously is NOT FUNNY at all. Firstly, if the airport authorities and MAS suspect that the birds that were sucked into the engines were swiftlets, the Department of Wildlife and Perhilitan should take immediate measures to ascertain the facts of the case, and that the swiftlet farms in Sepang DO NOT cause such dangerous incidents.Does Malaysia want to be the centre of some notoriety if one of the planes using the airport is brought down by swiftlets crashing into the Engines causing the deaths of hundreds of passengers? Knowing the fact that swiflet farms are in the vicinity, will Malaysia Airports Holdings be then deemed to be negligent, and be held responsible for the deaths? Why does Perhilitan allow the spokesperson of the Swiftlets Merchants Assocation to justify their existence (and to speak on Perhilitan's behalf) by announcing that it takes up to three years for anyone to determine the DNA of the birds that were sucked into the jet engines? Are our Ministries and Departments involved in this issue so inefficient that they cannot find a way to determine the DNA of the dead birds, say in three months? I think the travelling public deserves a proper explanation and better protection, from Malaysia Airport Holdings, not from the Swiftlet farmers..
"...The airport authorities suspect that the birds getting tangled into aircraft were swiftlets but there was no proof from Perhilitan to back their claims.It will take between two and three years for a DNA report to determine the species of birds that get tangled in the engines. They should get proof and provide data on how many accidents have been caused by swiftlets before asking the farmers to relocate...."
I was dumbfounded by the statement that it takes up to three years for somebody to identify the DNA of swiftlets? Other than the obvious cleverness in titling this report a "swift" decision, I feel such an important issue being treated so frivolously is NOT FUNNY at all. Firstly, if the airport authorities and MAS suspect that the birds that were sucked into the engines were swiftlets, the Department of Wildlife and Perhilitan should take immediate measures to ascertain the facts of the case, and that the swiftlet farms in Sepang DO NOT cause such dangerous incidents.Does Malaysia want to be the centre of some notoriety if one of the planes using the airport is brought down by swiftlets crashing into the Engines causing the deaths of hundreds of passengers? Knowing the fact that swiflet farms are in the vicinity, will Malaysia Airports Holdings be then deemed to be negligent, and be held responsible for the deaths? Why does Perhilitan allow the spokesperson of the Swiftlets Merchants Assocation to justify their existence (and to speak on Perhilitan's behalf) by announcing that it takes up to three years for anyone to determine the DNA of the birds that were sucked into the jet engines? Are our Ministries and Departments involved in this issue so inefficient that they cannot find a way to determine the DNA of the dead birds, say in three months? I think the travelling public deserves a proper explanation and better protection, from Malaysia Airport Holdings, not from the Swiftlet farmers..
Thursday, 8 October 2009
City Hall must be joking!!!
Reading the news City Hall: It is beyond our jurisdiction to act against cybercafes with tinted glass and the subsequent letter written by me Bar tinted glass at Internet cafes I cannot believe that City Hall and other local authorities have made the excuse that it is beyond their jurisdiction not to allow massage parlours and Cybercafes to have tinted glasses on their doors to "hide' the activities happening inside. Let us make something clear. The issue of a business permit for the premise comes from the Local Authority or City hall, and it is accepted that certain conditions are always stipulated for compliance, or the licence can be withdrawn. What is the difficulty for City hall to stipulate that the Cybercafe or Massage parlour must operate in conditions that are easily visible or accessible to the public and the authorities, and NO effort must be made to hide or avoid such activities from being observed by the public. Such conditions to the licences conform to reasonable Moral requirements of our society. Failure to comply can mean the forfeiture of the licence. The excuses "cooked" up by City Hall that MCMC is "in charge" is laughable at best, and is the worst example of an indifferent Govt at its worst...
Come on, why are we having KPIs when such nonsense is continuously being perpetuated?
Come on, why are we having KPIs when such nonsense is continuously being perpetuated?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
